インテリジェント・デザイン「進化論」関連記事
オーストラリア情報(びりーばー系除く)
National Breaking News 2005/10/21 Intelligent Design' scorned - From: AAP By Darrin Barnett October 21, 2005 AUSTRALIA'S scientific community has fired its first broadside in a looming war over a controversial theory of evolution known as intelligent design. http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,16988506-29277,00.html
The Australian 2005/10/21 Ban design theory in class: scientists - Leigh Dayton, Science writer 21oct05 A COALITION of more than 70,000 Australian scientists and science educators has condemned the teaching in science classes of "intelligent design" - a creationist-like theory of the origin of life. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,16986590,00.html
FairfaxDigital/Sydney Morning Herald 2005/10/21 Intelligent design not science: experts By Deborah Smith Science Editor October 21, 2005 - Intelligent design is as unscientific as the flat Earth theory and should not be taught in school science classes, a coalition representing 70,000 scientists and science teachers has warned. http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/intelligent-design-not-science-experts/2005/10/20/1129775902661.html
The Age 2005/10/21 Don't teach design theory: scientists By David Rood October 21, 2005 - AUSTRALIA'S scientific community has united to oppose the teaching of "intelligent design" in schools, saying it would open classrooms to unscientific views such as spoon-bending and alien abductions. http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/dont-teach-design-theory-scientists/2005/10/20/1129775901883.html
米国左翼系情報(読者から批判が甘いとの批判あり)
People's Weekly World 2005/10/20 Will science lose to 'intelligent design'? Author: David Kennell(David Kennell (kennell@borcim.wustl.edu) is a professor emeritus of molecular microbiology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.) http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/7954/1/291
ibid. 2005/04/07 Battle over evolution Author: Nick Bart( http://www.pww.org/article/author/view/54 ) http://www.pww.org/article/author/view/54
ibid. 2005/06/30 Intelligent design? Stupid idea! Emile Schepers( http://www.pww.org/article/author/view/11 ) http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/7331/1/276/
ibid. 2005/09/29 http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/7804/1/288/
HARRISBURG, Pa.: Parents sue to defend science
When evangelical Christian William Buckingham and his followers were elected to the Dover School Board in 2004, the first thing they did in a 6-3 vote is mandate that “intelligent design,” a synonym for creationism, be taught as science in the 2,800-student district. The debate and the vote were so acrimonious that board members Carol and Jeff Brown resigned in protest. “We have a vocal group within the community who feel very strongly in an evangelical Christian way that there is no separation of church and state,” said Carol Brown. “Our responsibility is to represent the viewpoints of all members of the community.”
Eight families sued the Dover school district to lift the “intelligent design” mandate, charging that it violates the separation of church and state. The case opened here Sept. 26 before U.S. Middle District Judge John E. Jones.
“The intelligent design movement is an effort to introduce creationism into the schools under a different name,” said Eric Rothschild, an attorney representing the families.
President Bush has weighed in, saying that school districts should teach both evolution and creationism.
KANSAS State Department of Education http://www.ksde.org/
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING MINUTE.
2005/03/08 http://www.ksde.org/commiss/march_2005_board_min.htm
2005/07/12 http://www.ksde.org/commiss/july_11_12_2005_board_minutes.htm
KANSAS SCIENCE STANDARDS PUBLIC HEARING 2005/02/15 http://www.ksde.org/outcomes/hays21505.htm
はてな日記「ダーウィンのブラックボックス-生命像への新しい挑戦」を含む日記
偉人に学ぶ id:pract:20050212
Bio-pmortal id:necromantic:20050308
